<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do You Make This Domain Name Mistake?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.websitedoctor.com/blog/set-canonical-domain-name/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.websitedoctor.com/blog/set-canonical-domain-name/</link>
	<description>Healthy site, healthy sales</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 20:11:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crystal</title>
		<link>http://www.websitedoctor.com/blog/set-canonical-domain-name/comment-page-1/#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>Crystal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 07:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logon.ie/internet-marketing-blog/seo/set-canonical-domain-name/#comment-98</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Is this good for page rank? I&#039;ve noticed that sometimes site.com will have PR, but www.site.com won&#039;t have a PR at all. (or vice versa). Perhaps if you used both for links it would spread your PR too thin&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this good for page rank? I&#8217;ve noticed that sometimes site.com will have PR, but <a href="http://www.site.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.site.com</a> won&#8217;t have a PR at all. (or vice versa). Perhaps if you used both for links it would spread your PR too thin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.websitedoctor.com/blog/set-canonical-domain-name/comment-page-1/#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 17:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logon.ie/internet-marketing-blog/seo/set-canonical-domain-name/#comment-97</guid>
		<description>This is a good reminder, however is there any benefit to one version (with www) over the other (without www)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a good reminder, however is there any benefit to one version (with www) over the other (without www)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
